Wednesday, February 29, 2012
The article in Clinical Professionals goes on to say (quoting Dekkers):
"...one of the fundamental problems is society’s 'general lack of appreciation for innovations.' If a patient has a serious illness and is doing better following treatment with a drug, 'he will obviously thank his doctor and maybe praise the hospital too.' However, 'it rarely occurs to anyone to thank the inventor and manufacturer of the medicine'."
The lack of appreciation for the effort of the Pharma industry is a major issue.
And this is a problem that the Pharma industry needs to seriously address.
Monday, February 20, 2012
You can view the article here. (Subscription required)
The article addresses the issue that the FDA is, unfortunately, woefully unprepared for the new world of Drug Development.
As Mr. Von Eschenbach writes, even FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg:
conceded to Congress in 2010 that 'the FDA is relying on 20th century regulatory science to evaluate 21st century medical products.'
And one of the major problems is that the FDA's inefficiency in evaluating new drugs, devices etc. ultimately leads to significantly higher costs for new drug and device development.
Von Eschenbach goes on to say:
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development has reported that clinical trials from 2003-2006 were nearly 70% longer than those from 1999-2002. Longer (and more complicated) trials have led to skyrocketing drug-development costs. High costs discourage investment in much-needed new therapies for conditions like obesity, diabetes and heart disease.
This is not a critique of the FDA itself.
They are doing what they can with the tools they have.
But the bottom line is that Congress and the Obama Administration need to make modernization of the Agency a priority because not only the health of our economy - but our very own health - is at stake.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
A major concern of a number of people I speak with in Pharma is that this sort of issue with counterfeit drugs will only get worse.
According to the article:
"Recent legislation introduced in the House would give the FDA greater resources and authority to inspect foreign drug imports. Separate legislation would create a mandatory barcode system to monitor the authenticity of all prescription drugs moving through the U.S. supply chain."
But the question is - Are these measures going to be enough?
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Drummy discusses the irony of how an industry that is supposed to by nature be innovative, instead appears to be afraid of the risk inherent in innovation.
Drummy believes that this lack of innovation is hurting the health of the industry.
He writes that:
"According to a new report published by Deloitte, the 12 largest pharma companies saw their ROI drop by 29 percent in the last year. The average internal rate of return for R&D dropped to 8.4 percent from 11.8 percent a year ago."
Drummy opines that the reason for Big Pharma's lack of innovation is that Executive Management at these companies are fostering a risk-averse culture. And he believes that unless there are changes in attitude at the top, Big Pharma companies will continue to eschew risk, and with that, continue to stifle innovation.
I think Drummy has a point. I was speaking a couple of years ago with a mid-level executive at one of the major Pharma companies. I asked him why his company's pipeline was so barren.
He laughed and replied that, "People here are less interested in making drugs, and more interested in 'covering their asses' ".
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
You can read it here.
The article highlights some coming Technological Transformations that bode well for the U.S.
While I don't necessarily agree with every point in the article - it is nice to read something positive about the United States' long term prospects for a change.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
You can read the article here.
The article discusses one of the major problems facing job seekers - the fact that their resume may never be seen by the Hiring Manager.
Ms. Weber writes:
"Many job seekers have long suspected their online employment applications disappear into a black hole, never to be seen again. Their fears may not be far off the mark, as more companies rely on technology to winnow out less-qualified candidates.Recruiters and hiring managers are overwhelmed by the volume of résumés pouring in, thanks to the weak job market and new tools that let applicants apply for a job with as little as one mouse click..."
Ms. Weber goes on to write:
"Only 19% of hiring managers at small companies look at a majority of the résumés they receive, and 47% say they review just a few, according to a recent survey by Information Strategies Inc., publisher of Your HR Digest, an online newsletter."
So what is a Job Seeker to do?
The answer - go back to the basics. By far, the single most effective way to get a job is by Networking. The bottom line is that you need to find someone who will place your resume on the desk of the Hiring Manager and say to them, "Here's someone I think you should talk to."
So reach out to the people in your own network. Or if you don't have a large network - you can "borrow someone's network" by using a Recruiter. Either way - by networking you will find that you will have far more success in your job search.